Posts

Posted on

Colorado’s “The Fight For Freedom”: Bill Seeks To Ban All Semi-Autos That Take Magazines

Wayne Thorn

Colorado’s new bill to ban all semi-autos that take magazines wants to strip away at 2nd Amendment RIGHTS.

On January 8, 2025, Colorado Democrats introduced Senate Bill 25-003, aiming to ban the manufacture, distribution, transfer, and sale of semiautomatic firearms that accept detachable magazines. This legislation targets a wide range of pistols and rifles, including popular models like the AR-15, which are commonly owned by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes. Critics argue that such a sweeping ban infringes upon Second Amendment rights, as it would prohibit the acquisition of firearms that are in common use for self-defense and other legal activities. The bill also seeks to outlaw rapid-fire trigger activators and bump stocks, further expanding its reach. While proponents believe the measure will enhance public safety, opponents contend that it overreaches by restricting access to firearms traditionally used for lawful purposes, thus undermining constitutionally protected rights.

Supporters of the Second Amendment are encouraged to reach out to their Colorado representatives and voice opposition to the proposed bill to ban semiautomatic firearms with detachable magazines. Advocates argue that if such legislation is enacted, it may set a precedent for similar measures in other states, potentially creating a ripple effect nationwide. Engaging with lawmakers at the state level is a key step in influencing the legislative process and ensuring the representation of diverse perspectives.

Go to this YouTube link for more detailed information on this bill: View here

Here is a list of sources related to Colorado’s proposed ban on semiautomatic firearms with detachable magazines:

1. The Colorado Sun Colorado Democrats introduce a bill to ban semiautomatic firearms with detachable magazines
Read here

2. National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) Colorado lawmakers propose semiautomatic ban bill, sparking Second Amendment concerns
Read here

3. Colorado’s Senate Bill 25-003 Colorado lawmakers propose semiautomatic ban bill
Read here

4. Colorado Legislators Legislators membership list Read here

My Thoughts

Colorado’s proposed bill to ban semiautomatic firearms with detachable magazines represents a contentious debate over public safety and constitutional rights. While supporters see it as a step toward reducing gun violence, critics view it as an overreach that infringes on the Second Amendment and limits access to firearms commonly used for lawful purposes. The outcome of this legislation could have far-reaching implications, not only for Colorado but also for other states considering similar measures. It underscores the importance of civic engagement, urging individuals to advocate for their perspectives and actively participate in shaping the laws that affect their rights and communities.

Note: The percentage of homicides in Colorado in 2022, relative to its population of 5,850,935, is approximately 0.0052% or 304 homicides. (2023 and 2024 records were not available as of this posting)


In the United States, there are over 2.5 million instances annually where firearms are used for self-defense, including situations where the weapon is fired or simply displayed to deter a threat.

Contact me: [email protected]

Write me with your comments, questions, or concerns.

Posted on

Hearing Protection Act Would Remove Suppressors From NFA!!

Wayne Thorn

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution stands as a cornerstone of our nation’s founding principles, guaranteeing the right of the people to keep and bear arms. This right is not merely a historical relic but a safeguard of individual freedom and a cornerstone of our national identity. However, in recent years, this constitutional protection has come under increasing scrutiny and threat, with legislative proposals aimed at imposing restrictions that many believe infringe upon this fundamental liberty. It is imperative for all of us who cherish our freedoms to take a stand and ensure that our voices are heard.

I urge every 2A supporter to contact their House or Senate representative and demand unwavering protection of our Second Amendment rights. Now is the time to remind our elected officials that the phrase “shall not be infringed” is not open to interpretation or compromise. By speaking out collectively, we send a clear message to our government: we will not tolerate any encroachment on the freedoms guaranteed to us by the Constitution. Together, we can preserve and protect this essential right for generations to come.

Below is a copy of both Bills so you can compare them.

SENATE BILLS-118s401is (English) PDF: DOWNLOAD

HOUSE BILLS-118hr152ih (English) PDF: DOWNLOAD

When you look at both of them they’re pretty much the same except for the House bill.

In the House bill sec 6, 1, B

If I could advocate for a change, it would be to allow the freedom to manufacture personal suppressors without the requirement for serialization, whether they are homemade or purchased.

Throughout much of U.S. history, there have been few restrictions on the personal manufacture of firearms for personal use. Historically, individuals were generally free to make firearms for themselves without legal barriers.

HERE ARE SOME OF THEM

During the time of the writing of the U.S. Constitution (1787) and the ratification of the Bill of Rights (1791), there were very few restrictions on firearm ownership or manufacture. The Second Amendment, ratified in 1791, explicitly stated, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This reflected a cultural and practical necessity for firearm ownership during the era.

However, there were a few notable restrictions or practices related to arms regulation during this time:

1. Militia Service Requirements

  • Many states had laws requiring able-bodied men to own firearms for militia service. These laws mandated that individuals possess arms and ammunition in working condition, effectively making firearm ownership not just a right but an obligation for many.
  • For example, the Militia Act of 1792 required all free, able-bodied white male citizens aged 18 to 45 to equip themselves with a musket, ammunition, and other supplies for militia duty.

2. Class and Racial Restrictions

  • Some laws restricted firearm ownership for enslaved people and free Black individuals. For example:
    • Virginia (1640s onward): Laws prohibited enslaved people from owning firearms, and even free Black individuals often required special permissions.
    • Other colonies and states had similar restrictions aimed at maintaining control over marginalized populations.

3. Firearm Use in Public Spaces

  • Certain municipalities or colonies enacted laws to regulate the carrying or discharge of firearms in specific settings, such as within town limits or during public gatherings. These restrictions were often aimed at preventing accidents or maintaining public order, not disarming the populace.
  • For instance, some towns prohibited the firing of guns during celebrations or near public buildings.

4. Storage and Maintenance Requirements

  • In some places, laws required firearms to be properly maintained and stored to ensure they were available for militia use. This was less about restricting ownership and more about ensuring readiness.

5. Restrictions on Gunpowder

  • Many towns and cities had regulations on the storage and transportation of gunpowder due to the risk of fire and explosions. For example:
    • Boston (1720s): Laws limited how much gunpowder could be stored in homes and required it to be kept in designated storage facilities.

Notable Absence of Restrictions:

  • There were no federal or state laws restricting the manufacture of firearms for personal use, and individuals were free to make or modify their own weapons.
  • Serialization, background checks, licensing, and other modern regulatory mechanisms did not exist.

Summary

At the time of the Constitution’s writing, most restrictions related to firearms were tied to militia service, public safety, and social control (e.g., racial exclusions). There were no federal restrictions on personal firearm manufacture, and the prevailing attitude strongly supported widespread ownership and use of arms, both for individual self-defense and collective security.

I just emailed my congressman to express my support for this bill. I also suggested a change to remove Section 6, 1, B, as it restricts the ability to manufacture personal suppressors and requires serialization for purchased suppressors, which I believe should not be mandatory.

I encourage all 2A supporters to reach out to their House and Senate representatives and urge them to stand against any attempts to impose restrictions on our Second Amendment rights, which clearly state, “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Let’s make our voices heard and protect our freedoms.

SUBSCRIBE

CONTACT ME: [email protected]

About anything, comments to articles, questions you may have, etc.

Posted on

Sanctity of Life

Cecil W Thorn

In a world where the value of life is often debated, the Scriptures present an unwavering perspective on its sanctity. From the beginning, God established human life as sacred, weaving His divine image into each soul and setting humanity apart with inherent dignity. His provision, care, and intentional design extend to all—both the born and the unborn. By examining God’s Word, we can see that every life holds unique worth and purpose in His eyes. Through His love, we are called to honor, protect, and value life in all its stages, acknowledging that each person is part of His divine plan. This study will explore the sanctity of life as revealed in Scripture, God’s intentional provision for every person, and the high value He places on life, inviting us to reflect on our role in honoring His creation.

1. Sanctity of Life

Genesis 1:27
“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.”

Commentary
This foundational verse establishes the sanctity of human life, as it reveals that humans are created in God’s own image. This divine imprint endows every person with inherent worth and dignity. The sanctity of life stems from this divine creation, underscoring that every life, from conception, holds sacred value because it reflects the Creator Himself. Human life is, therefore, not merely biological but imbued with spiritual significance and worth.

Psalm 139:13-16
“For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother’s womb… Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them.”

Commentary
David’s words emphasize God’s intimate knowledge and care for each life, even in the womb. This passage highlights that God not only creates life but also actively shapes and knows each person before birth. The detailed care God takes in forming each individual underscores the sanctity of every human life, as each one is precious and purposed by God Himself.

2. God’s Provision for Both the Born and Unborn

Jeremiah 1:5
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I appointed you a prophet to the nations.”

Commentary
God’s words to Jeremiah reveal that He not only forms each person in the womb but has purposes and plans for each life even before birth. This affirms the worth of the unborn and God’s intimate involvement in each life. The notion that God knows and calls individuals before they are born emphasizes His provision and value for life from its very inception.

Isaiah 46:3-4
“Listen to me, O house of Jacob, all the remnant of the house of Israel, who have been borne by me from before your birth, carried from the womb; even to your old age I am he, and to gray hairs I will carry you. I have made, and I will bear; I will carry and will save.”

Commentary
This passage highlights God’s provision and care from conception through every stage of life. The imagery of God carrying His people from the womb to old age reflects His unfailing support and provision. It underscores the value He places on each person’s life journey, affirming that His concern spans all of life, born and unborn alike.

3. Value God Places on Life

Deuteronomy 30:19
“I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live.”

Commentary
God’s exhortation to “choose life” indicates that He values life as a precious gift. This choice reflects His desire for individuals and communities to embrace life in alignment with His will. It speaks to the communal aspect of valuing life, encouraging actions that honor and sustain life not only for the individual but for future generations.

John 10:10
“The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly.”

Commentary
Jesus’ words in John emphasize His mission to bring abundant life, contrasting sharply with the destruction caused by sin. Jesus’ desire for people to experience fullness of life underscores God’s ultimate value on life itself—not just existence, but a life enriched by His presence and purpose. It is a call to live lives that reflect God’s image, value His creation, and uphold the sanctity of life in every form.

My Thoughts

The Scriptures present an unmistakable message about the sanctity and value of life. Through verses that span the Bible, we see God’s intentional creation, provision, and plan for every person, from conception to old age. Life is more than biological existence; it’s a sacred reflection of God’s image, woven with purpose and worth by the Creator Himself. This calls us not only to recognize life’s value but to act as stewards, protecting and honoring life in all stages. As we journey through this study, may we deepen our understanding of God’s heart for humanity and feel compelled to uphold the dignity and sacredness of every life. Through honoring life, we honor Him who is the source of life itself.

Posted on

Prioritize the needs of our citizens above all else

Wayne Thorn

This is a comparison of the assistance the U.S. government provides to foreign countries and illegal immigrants versus the support available for U.S. citizens.

US Government Assistance to Foreign Countries (So far for this year 2024)

$24,400,000,000 to Ukraine.
$11,300,000,000 to Israel.
$1,950,000,000 to Ethiopia.
$1,600,000,000 to Jordan.
$1,400,000,000 to Egypt.
$1,100,000,000 to Afghanistan.
$1,100,000,000 to Somalia.
$1,000,000,000 to Yemen.
$987,000,000 to Congo.
$896,000,000 to Syria.

Total: $45,733,000,000

(For financial support, military aid, food assistance, and health programs)

US Government Assistance for Illegal Immigrant

$129,600,000,000,000,000 to illegal immigrant ($9,000 per illegal immigrant that has entered the U.S. from January- June 2024 current estimates 1.44 million according to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

(For Food Assistance, Clothing Assistance, Counseling Services, Health Insurance, Employment Support, Housing Assistance, Public Education, Adult Education, Immigration Legal Services, Phone and service)

US Government most recent Assistance for American Citizens

$3,750,000,000 to approximately 5 million people (Americans who have lost everything to Hurricane Helene will be getting $750, courtesy of FEMA)

$11,000,000,000 for approximately 33,000 Homeless Veterans (For housing, health care, and supportive services)

$3,700,000,000 for approximately 580,000 General Homeless (For shelter, medical care, or long-term housing solutions)

Total: $17,600,000,000

My Thoughts

Our country is currently facing significant challenges, including rising costs for food, gas, electricity, and housing. It’s essential that we prioritize the needs of our nation and its citizens above all else, ensuring they have the resources necessary to lead fulfilling lives and support their families. It seems we have lost our way in this regard.

SUBSCRIBE

Posted on

A voice cries: In the wilderness

Wayne Thorn

Here is Psalms 20:6-9 from the King James Version (KJV):

6 Now know I that the Lord saveth his anointed;
he will hear him from his holy heaven
with the saving strength of his right hand.
7 Some trust in chariots, and some in horses:
but we will remember the name of the Lord our God.
8 They are brought down and fallen:
but we are risen, and stand upright.
9 Save, Lord:
let the king hear us when we call.

These verses convey a similar message, emphasizing trust in God’s strength over human power, while expressing confidence in His divine salvation and unwavering support.

40 MILLION CHRISTIANS DON’T VOTE

15 MILLION AREN’T EVEN REGISTERED

Isaiah 40:3 (ESV):
“A voice cries:
‘In the wilderness prepare the way of the Lord;
make straight in the desert a highway for our God.'”

We are now the voice crying in the wilderness in this time and place that the savior of all has come to give use life, life eternal with the father.

The statement “We are now the voice crying in the wilderness in this time and place that the Savior of all has come to give us life, life eternal with the Father” draws from the biblical imagery of John the Baptist as the forerunner who prepared the way for Christ. It also reflects a call for believers to take up that same mantle today.

“We are now the voice crying in the wilderness”:

    • In biblical times, John the Baptist was the voice in the wilderness, proclaiming the coming of Jesus and calling people to repentance. In today’s context, we, as believers, have taken on the role of proclaiming the good news of Christ’s coming. The wilderness symbolizes the spiritual desolation or confusion in the world—a place where many are lost, distant from God, and searching for meaning. As voices in this wilderness, we are called to guide people towards Christ, just as John did.

    1. “In this time and place”:

      • This phrase highlights the urgency of the call. Every era and generation faces unique challenges—whether moral, social, or spiritual. In our current age, the distractions of modern life, secularism, and materialism often act as barriers to hearing God’s voice. Now, more than ever, the world needs voices that cut through this spiritual noise, proclaiming the eternal truths of the gospel in the context of present-day challenges.

      2. “That the Savior of all has come”:

        • This affirms the central truth of the Christian faith: Jesus Christ, the Savior, has come into the world. His coming was not just for a specific group of people or time but for all humanity, throughout all history. Our message, as “voices crying in the wilderness,” is to proclaim the arrival of Jesus, the fulfillment of the prophecy that John the Baptist once heralded. We point to the fact that the Savior has come, bridging the gap between humanity and God.

        3. “To give us life, life eternal with the Father”:

          • The heart of the gospel message is not only about salvation from sin but also about the gift of eternal life. Through Jesus’ sacrifice, we are offered a life that transcends earthly existence, a relationship with God that begins now and lasts forever. Our task as modern-day “voices in the wilderness” is to proclaim this gift—life with the Father, secured through faith in Christ. We are called to share the hope of eternal life, which offers a deep sense of purpose and peace amid the uncertainties of the world.

          In essence:

          This statement calls believers to recognize that we are living in a spiritually dry and confused world—a “wilderness”—and just as John the Baptist prepared the way for Christ’s first coming, we are now preparing the way for hearts to receive Him in the present. Our role is to boldly proclaim the life-changing truth that Jesus has already come to bring salvation and eternal life, inviting people into a life-giving relationship with the Father. We are entrusted with sharing this message of hope, redemption, and eternal life, becoming voices of God’s grace and love in a world that desperately needs it.

          Stand Up

          We must stand up, just as our country did at its founding, by using the powerful tools we have—our voices and our votes. The principles on which this nation was built call us to engage actively, and it is our responsibility to ensure that godly values are represented in our leadership and policies.

          As Christians, we cannot sit idly by while our government is increasingly influenced by voices that reject God’s truth in favor of subjective feelings and personal agendas. There are those who shout loudly, demanding that their views be accepted, but we must remember that our foundation is not built on human opinion but on the eternal truth of God.

          There is only one truth—God’s truth—and it transcends personal feelings, opinions, and cultural trends. Now is the time for believers to boldly stand for what is right, guided by Scripture, and to use the influence we have been given to promote righteousness in our communities and our nation.

          Make your voice heard VOTE

          Posted on

          Harris – will go back to her Marxist ways

          Cecil Thorn

          The former president Trump interpreted Sanders’ comments on Fox News as an admission that Harris had only changed her “Marxist policy positions” for the election and would revert to her original stances once in office.

          Why does Kamala Harris frequently shift her policy positions and fail to present comprehensive policy outlines for the public to review, instead offering only fragments at rallies?

          Why does she adjust her accent based on the location of her rallies?

          1. Kamala Harris appears to be appealing to different groups by telling them what they want to hear, aiming to secure more votes. Instead of presenting a clear, comprehensive policy agenda for the public to review, she often provides selective or incomplete details, leaving voters without a full understanding of her plans.
          2. Kamala Harris adjusts her accent based on the location of her rallies to connect with different audiences. However, this tactic can sometimes be criticized as inauthentic, with some voters feeling that it’s an attempt to pander to specific groups rather than a display of genuine communication.

          My Final Thought

          Kamala Harris’ approach to communicating her policies, including selectively sharing details and adjusting her message to appeal to different groups, raises concerns about the clarity and transparency of her platform. By not providing comprehensive, accessible policy plans for the public to fully evaluate, voters are left without a complete understanding of where she stands on key issues. Her tendency to shift positions and tailor her rhetoric based on her audience can create uncertainty about what her actual priorities would be if she were elected President.

          This lack of consistency and clarity may leave voters questioning what they will ultimately get with Harris in office. Without a firm, detailed agenda that is accessible to all, it’s difficult to know which policies she would prioritize or how her leadership would unfold. This uncertainty creates a challenge for those who are seeking strong, unwavering leadership and clear policy direction from a potential President.

          Posted on

          Presidential Candidates: Key priorities and plans they intends to pursue.

          2024 Trump Harris
          Wayne Thorn

          Understanding how the policies and plans of each candidate could affect us is crucial because these decisions have real-world consequences that shape our daily lives and future. A candidate’s policies can impact the economy, healthcare, education, and social justice, directly influencing our financial stability, access to services, and quality of life. By analyzing their plans, we can make informed decisions that align with our values and needs, ensuring that the leadership we choose works in our best interests and those of our communities. This awareness empowers us to participate more actively in the democratic process and advocate for policies that promote a better future for everyone.

          Donald Trump

          If Donald Trump is reelected in 2024, he has outlined several key priorities and plans that he intends to pursue. These plans reflect his ongoing political themes and goals from his previous presidency, as well as new initiatives. Here are some of the major points:

          2024 Republican Party Platform HERE

          • Tax Cuts: Trump has promised to further cut taxes, particularly for middle-income families, and potentially make the 2017 tax cuts permanent.
          • Deregulation: He plans to continue rolling back regulations on businesses, particularly in energy, finance, and healthcare, to stimulate economic growth.
          • Trade Policies: Trump is likely to return to his “America First” trade policies, which could include renegotiating trade deals and imposing tariffs to protect American industries.

          2. Immigration:

          • Border Security: Trump plans to resume and expand the construction of the border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. He also intends to implement stricter immigration policies, including reintroducing policies like “Remain in Mexico” and possibly reinstating travel bans on certain countries.
          • Immigration Reform: His plans include further limiting legal immigration and continuing efforts to end birthright citizenship.

          3. Foreign Policy:

          • America First Approach: Trump is expected to continue his “America First” foreign policy, focusing on reducing U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts and prioritizing national interests.
          • China and Russia: He has emphasized a tough stance on China, focusing on trade, technology, and security issues. His approach to Russia could involve reducing tensions and seeking cooperation on certain global issues, though this has been controversial.
          • Middle East: Trump may continue to pursue peace agreements between Israel and Arab nations, similar to the Abraham Accords.

          4. Energy Policies:

          • Energy Independence: Trump aims to increase domestic energy production, particularly in fossil fuels, to achieve U.S. energy independence. He has criticized Biden’s green energy policies and plans to reverse many of them.
          • Climate Policy: Trump is likely to withdraw from or weaken international climate agreements and reduce environmental regulations that he believes harm the U.S. economy.

          5. Healthcare:

          • Repealing Obamacare: Trump has consistently advocated for repealing the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and replacing it with a system that promotes competition and reduces costs, though specific details have been less clear.
          • Drug Prices: He has also emphasized lowering prescription drug prices, continuing efforts from his first term.

          6. Law and Order:

          • Crime and Policing: Trump has pledged to be tough on crime, advocating for strong law enforcement and opposing efforts to defund the police. He may push for stricter penalties on violent crime and drug trafficking.
          • Judicial Appointments: Continuing to appoint conservative judges to federal courts, including the Supreme Court, will likely be a priority.

          7. Education:

          • School Choice: Trump is a strong advocate for school choice, including expanding charter schools and voucher programs that allow parents to choose where their children attend school.

          8. Military and Veterans:

          • Defense Spending: Trump has advocated for maintaining or increasing defense spending to ensure military readiness and superiority.
          • Veteran Care: He plans to continue reforms to the Department of Veterans Affairs to improve healthcare and services for veterans.

          9. Culture and Social Issues:

          • Cultural Conservatism: Trump is likely to continue emphasizing traditional values, opposing what he describes as “woke” culture, and pushing back against progressive social policies.
          • Free Speech: He may pursue policies to limit the influence of tech companies and protect free speech, particularly on social media platforms.

          Trump’s future plans, if he is reelected, align with his previous presidency’s goals, emphasizing economic growth, national security, and conservative social values. His policies are expected to continue being divisive, appealing strongly to his base while facing significant opposition from his critics.

          Kamala Harris

          If Kamala Harris were to be elected as President, her plans would likely reflect a continuation and expansion of many of the Biden administration’s priorities, along with her own initiatives. Here’s an overview of what might be expected based on her political career, public statements, and current policy priorities:

          1. Economic Policies:

          • Economic Equity: Harris has consistently emphasized addressing economic disparities. As president, she would likely prioritize policies aimed at reducing income inequality, supporting middle and lower-income families, and promoting economic opportunities for historically marginalized communities.
          • Support for Small Businesses: Harris might focus on providing more support for small businesses, especially those owned by women and minorities, through grants, loans, and tax incentives.
          • Workforce Development: She is likely to promote education and training programs to prepare workers for jobs in emerging industries, particularly in technology and clean energy.

          2. Healthcare:

          • Universal Healthcare: While Harris supported “Medicare for All” during her 2020 presidential campaign, she has since indicated support for expanding the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) as a more incremental approach. Her presidency would likely aim to increase healthcare coverage and reduce costs.
          • Women’s Health: Harris would likely be a strong advocate for protecting and expanding access to reproductive healthcare, including abortion rights, and addressing maternal health disparities, particularly among women of color.

          3. Climate Change and Environmental Policy:

          • Aggressive Climate Action: Harris has a strong record on environmental issues and would likely push for ambitious climate policies, including significant investments in renewable energy, infrastructure, and jobs. She would likely support rejoining international climate agreements and taking a leading role in global climate efforts.
          • Environmental Justice: A key focus for Harris would be on environmental justice, ensuring that low-income communities and communities of color are protected from environmental hazards and benefit from the transition to a green economy.

          4. Social Justice and Civil Rights:

          • Racial Justice: Harris would likely continue to focus on racial justice, including reforms in policing, criminal justice, and addressing systemic racism across various sectors. She has been a vocal advocate for police reform and might push for stronger federal oversight of police practices.
          • LGBTQ+ Rights: Harris is a strong supporter of LGBTQ+ rights and would likely advocate for policies to protect these rights, including federal legislation to protect against discrimination.

          5. Immigration:

          • Comprehensive Immigration Reform: Harris would likely push for comprehensive immigration reform that includes a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, protections for Dreamers, and reforms to the asylum and refugee systems. She has advocated for more humane immigration policies and would likely seek to roll back Trump-era restrictions.
          • Border Security with Compassion: While she would likely support border security measures, Harris is expected to emphasize humane treatment of migrants and improvements to the immigration and asylum processes.

          6. Education:

          • Access to Education: Harris is likely to advocate for increased access to education, including making community college free and reducing the burden of student loans. She has also supported increased funding for public schools, particularly in underserved areas.
          • Early Childhood Education: A strong proponent of early childhood education, Harris would likely push for universal pre-kindergarten and increased support for childcare.

          7. Foreign Policy:

          • Diplomacy and Alliances: Harris would likely continue the Biden administration’s emphasis on strengthening international alliances and multilateralism. She would likely focus on diplomacy, human rights, and global cooperation to address issues like climate change and global health.
          • Humanitarian Focus: Harris might prioritize humanitarian efforts, including refugee resettlement and global health initiatives, as part of her broader foreign policy agenda.

          8. Gun Control:

          • Stricter Gun Laws: Harris is a strong advocate for gun control and would likely push for stricter gun laws, including universal background checks, an assault weapons ban, and measures to prevent gun violence through red flag laws and other preventive strategies.

          9. Women’s Rights:

          • Gender Equality: Harris would likely focus on policies aimed at closing the gender pay gap, expanding paid family leave, and supporting women in the workforce, particularly in leadership roles.
          • Combating Violence Against Women: Harris might advocate for stronger protections and resources for survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking.

          10. Technology and Innovation:

          • Tech Regulation: Harris might push for greater regulation of big tech companies, particularly around issues of privacy, data protection, and misinformation. She could also focus on expanding broadband access and digital literacy.

          Kamala Harris’s presidency would likely reflect a blend of progressive ideals and pragmatic governance, with a focus on equity, justice, and inclusive economic growth. Her policies would likely build on her experience as a senator and vice president, with a strong emphasis on civil rights, climate action, and social justice.

          My Thoughts

          When choosing the leaders of our nation, it’s crucial to make informed decisions, as their policies will shape our future. The differences between the candidates are substantial. For instance, Trump has clearly outlined his plans for the country, which are readily accessible online. In contrast, Harris has not provided specific details about her agenda, though it’s likely her priorities will align with those mentioned above. However, there’s still uncertainty about how she would govern.

          It’s essential to do your own research and reach your own conclusions. Consider which candidate’s vision aligns most closely with your beliefs about how the government should operate.

          Posted on

          My opinion!

          Cecil Thorn

          Revelation 7:17 (ESV) says:

          “For the Lamb in the midst of the throne will be their shepherd, and he will guide them to springs of living water, and God will wipe away every tear from their eyes.”