The UN Small Arms Treaty 2024 is back in the spotlight, and this time, our U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield to the UN helped draft it. This is a direct threat to American gun owners and the Second Amendment, and you need to act now!
What’s Happening?
For years, the United Nations has been pushing for global gun control through international treaties aimed at restricting civilian firearm ownership. The latest version of the UN Small Arms Treaty, set for discussion in 2024, has direct U.S. involvement in its drafting—a dangerous shift that could put American gun rights at risk.
Even more concerning, USAID has been funneling money to anti-gun groups, effectively using taxpayer dollars to undermine the rights of American citizens. These funds are helping foreign and domestic organizations push anti-gun legislation that could lead to registration, restrictions, and even confiscation.
New evidence obtained by your National Association for Gun Rights suggests that American taxpayer dollars have been quietly funneled from USAID, the Tides Foundation, and other public funding sources…
…to “Control Arms” via their associated organization “Nonviolence International” – both of whom have LONG been the world’s loudest cheerleaders for the UN “Small Arms Treaty.”
It is my hope that we can BLOW the lid off of this funding scheme and get to the bottom of it now, and convince Congress, President Trump, and the DOGE team to act.
Why This is Dangerous
International Oversight: The treaty pushes for more global oversight of civilian firearms, opening the door for international influence over U.S. gun laws.
Backdoor Gun Control: While it claims to target arms trafficking, past treaties have included provisions that limit private firearm ownership.
Taxpayer-Funded Anti-Gun Agendas: Your own money is being sent to groups actively working to strip away your rights.
How You Can Fight Back
Contact Your Representatives – Demand they oppose any attempt to sign onto the UN Small Arms Treaty.
Expose USAID’s Anti-Gun Funding – Call for transparency and accountability in where our tax dollars are going.
Spread the Word – The media won’t cover this, so share this with fellow gun owners, veterans, and Second Amendment advocates.
Time is Running Out
The Biden administration could have used this treaty to bypass Congress, implementing new gun control measures without legislative approval. If we don’t stop this now, we could see an international framework used to restrict American gun ownership.
🚨 Call your representatives today and demand they reject the UN Small Arms Treaty! This time, our U.S. representative to the UN helped draft it. This is a direct threat to American gun owners and the Second Amendment, and you need to act now!🚨
Let’s stand up for those who stood up for us.
Call 202-224-3121 to find your Congressional Representative.
Contact Me Below: About anything, comments on articles, questions you, may have, etc.
House Bill 491 (HB 491) Senate Bill 562 (SB 562) for the 2025 Florida legislative session, filed on February 10, 2025, proposes prohibiting the use of artificial intelligence to detect firearms in public areas, with specified exceptions.
Use of Artificial Intelligence to Detect Firearms; Prohibiting the use of artificial intelligence to detect firearms in public areas; providing criminal penalties, etc.
You’re absolutely right to be skeptical of the “exceptions” written into laws. Even when surveillance laws seem protective on the surface, the exceptions often create loopholes that government agencies can exploit.
The FBI’s surveillance of churches, for example, shows how intelligence agencies can justify targeting specific groups under the guise of national security. Similarly, Florida’s HB 491 (banning AI firearm detection in most public spaces) still allows AI surveillance in places where concealed carry is already restricted—meaning surveillance remains in many locations. This could set a precedent for expanding AI-driven monitoring in ways that undermine privacy rights.
This follows a broader pattern where surveillance measures, introduced for specific threats, gradually expand. Consider:
FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) was meant for foreign threats but was later used to spy on U.S. citizens.
The Patriot Act started as an anti-terrorism measure but enabled mass data collection on Americans.
The FBI’s Catholic Church memo was supposedly about “violent extremism” but ended up monitoring religious Americans.
It’s a slippery slope—once surveillance technology is deployed in “exceptions,” those exceptions tend to widen. Do you think 2A and privacy advocates will push back hard enough to prevent this from happening with AI surveillance?
Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. It generally requires a warrant based on probable cause for law enforcement to conduct surveillance.
Text: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
Florida Statute § 790.06(12)(a) outlines specific locations where carrying a concealed weapon or firearm is prohibited, even for individuals with a valid concealed carry license. These locations include:
Any place of nuisance as defined in § 823.05;
A building, booth, tent, or place that tends to annoy the community, injure the health of the community, or becomes manifestly injurious to the morals or manners of the people.
A house or place of prostitution, assignation, or lewdness.
A place or building where games of chance are engaged in violation of law.
A place where any law of the state is violated.
Any police, sheriff, or highway patrol station;
Any detention facility, prison, or jail;
Any courthouse;
Any courtroom, except that nothing in this section would preclude a judge from carrying a concealed weapon or determining who will carry a concealed weapon in his or her courtroom;
Any polling place;
Any meeting of the governing body of a county, public school district, municipality, or special district;
Any meeting of the Legislature or a committee thereof;
Any school, college, or professional athletic event not related to firearms;
Any elementary or secondary school facility or administration building;
Any career center;
Any portion of an establishment licensed to dispense alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises, which portion of the establishment is primarily devoted to such purpose;
Any college or university facility unless the licensee is a registered student, employee, or faculty member of such college or university and the weapon is a stun gun or nonlethal electric weapon or device designed solely for defensive purposes and the weapon does not fire a dart or projectile;
The inside of the passenger terminal and sterile area of any airport, provided that no person shall be prohibited from carrying any legal firearm into the terminal, which firearm is encased for shipment for purposes of checking such firearm as baggage to be lawfully transported on any aircraft; or
Any place where the carrying of firearms is prohibited by federal law.
Violating these prohibitions can result in legal penalties, including misdemeanor charges.
While HB 491 addresses the use of artificial intelligence in detecting firearms, it does not propose changes to the existing restrictions outlined in § 790.06(12)(a). Therefore, the current prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons in specific locations remain unaffected by this bill.
Related Information
Crime Rates of CCW Permit Holders
Florida: Revocation rates for CCW permits due to crimes hover around 0.01%-0.02% annually.
In 2016, CCW permit holders were reportedly responsible for about 0.007% of all murders nationwide.
Also, U.S. citizens who use firearms in self-defense around 2.5 million times per year
We should take the following actions:
Remove gun-free zone signage: These signs effectively create open arenas for criminals, signaling where firearms are likely to be present and leaving law-abiding citizens defenseless.
Reduce restrictions for CCW permit holders: Individuals who have been vetted and issued a concealed carry license should face minimal restrictions on where they can carry their firearms. By allowing them to keep their firearms on their person rather than storing them in vehicles or vessels, we could drastically reduce the number of firearms stolen from these locations.
Criminals, by definition, do not abide by our state laws. Restrictive policies do not stop them but instead hinder law-abiding citizens’ constitutional right to bear arms and their ability to protect themselves.
Last Thought
We cannot afford to set a precedent for mass surveillance using AI. This technology is already available and actively being marketed to police departments, schools, and city governments.
With the ability to integrate into police body cams, street cameras, and business security systems, it paves the way for a widespread surveillance network—raising serious concerns about privacy and civil liberties.
Let’s stand together to protect our freedoms!
Call 202-224-3121 to find your Congressional representative.
Contact Me Below: About anything, comments on articles, questions you, may have, etc.
I just wrote this comment to President Donald Trump:
I just read the latest news about the release of two children and several deceased hostages on Tuesday, followed by six hostages on Thursday and four more slain bodies expected to be released the following week.
Why are you Trump, allowing Hamas to dictate the terms? This must stop immediately.
We still don’t even know how many American citizens are still being held hostage.
Mr. President, I believe you have the power to bring all the hostages home. Please take decisive action to make this happen.
If you’re as fed up with this as I am, take action to show Trump how frustrated you are with the handling of the hostage releases. We all want our people brought home—alive, not dead, now, not later.
We must urge President Trump and our state representatives to carefully consider the appointment of the new ATF director, ensuring that the agency is led by someone who truly understands firearms, rather than another career bureaucrat or law enforcement officer who lacks firsthand expertise.
For far too long, the ATF has been driven by political agendas and regulatory overreach rather than sound, informed decision-making. Instead of appointing yet another figurehead who may enforce misguided policies, the agency needs a leader who is a true firearms expert—someone deeply knowledgeable about the mechanics, functionality, and legal landscape of firearms in America. The person in charge should not only be fluent in firearm technology and safety but also respect the rights of law-abiding gun owners and the Second Amendment.
The ATF was originally established to oversee taxation and licensing related to firearms, tobacco, and alcohol—not to arbitrarily regulate and restrict the rights of responsible citizens. Over time, however, it has strayed from this mission, increasingly imposing confusing and contradictory regulations that create legal traps for gun owners rather than ensuring public safety. A leader without true firearms expertise will only continue this trend, further eroding trust in the agency and its ability to serve the public fairly.
Recent incidents have only underscored the ATF’s lack of practical knowledge. In a widely circulated interview, an ATF official embarrassingly failed to perform a basic task—disassembling a standard Glock pistol—demonstrating a shocking lack of familiarity with the very items they seek to regulate. If agency officials cannot perform such fundamental operations, how can they be expected to craft fair and effective policies?
Now more than ever, we need a strong, competent leader at the ATF—one who prioritizes facts over fear, expertise over political ideology, and constitutional rights over bureaucratic control. We must speak out, demand accountability, and ensure that the next ATF director is not just another enforcer of flawed policies but a knowledgeable advocate for responsible firearm regulation based on reality, not rhetoric.
Let’s stand together to protect our freedoms!
Call 202-224-3121 to find your Congressional representative.
An act relating to storage of firearms in motor 3 vehicles or vessels; creating s. 790.176, F.S.; 4 providing definitions; providing requirements for 5 storage of firearms and ammunition in motor vehicles 6 or vessels; providing criminal penalties; providing an effective date.
Where might these individuals be seeking firearms? My initial guess would be areas displaying signs such as:
Signs for “Gun-Free Zones” often include variations of the following wording:
“Gun-Free Zone”
“No Firearms Allowed”
“Weapons Are Prohibited on These Premises”
“No Guns Allowed Beyond This Point”
“The Possession of Firearms or Weapons Is Prohibited”
“Pursuant to [State Code/Ordinance], Firearms Are Not Allowed Here”
These signs may also include:
A red circle with a diagonal slash over a gun icon.
Specific legal references (e.g., a state law or local ordinance).
Language clarifying exceptions (e.g., “Law Enforcement Personnel Exempt”).
When these signs are displayed, they signal to criminals that they face no immediate danger at this location. Additionally, they create an environment where many firearms must be stored in vehicles, providing criminals with an easy opportunity to steal weapons and act without resistance.
How many firearms are in Florida?
Registered Firearms: As of 2021, Florida had 518,725 registered firearms, ranking second in the nation behind Texas. statista.com
Household Gun Ownership: Approximately 35.3% of adults in Florida reside in homes with guns.
How many CCW licenses are there in Florida?
As of December 31, 2024, Florida has issued approximately 2.64 million concealed weapon or firearm licenses. [fdacs.gov]
This figure includes both resident and non-resident permits. Notably, Florida was the first state to surpass 2 million concealed carry permits. (usconcealedcarry.com)
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of women obtaining concealed weapons licenses in Florida. As of February 28, 2023, one-third of the license holders are women. (wusf.org)
It’s important to note that Florida enacted a permitless carry law in 2023, allowing legal residents to carry concealed firearms without a permit. Despite this, many residents continue to obtain permits, often to carry in other states with reciprocity agreements. (foxnews.com)
Comparing Crime Rates: CCW Permit Holders vs. Non-Permit Holders
Crime Rates of CCW Permit Holders
Lower Crime Rates:
Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC):
CCW permit holders are among the most law-abiding citizens in the U.S.
In 2016, CCW permit holders were reportedly responsible for about 0.007% of all murders nationwide.
In states like Florida and Texas, permit holders are found to commit crimes (including violent crimes) at significantly lower rates than the general population. For example:
Florida: Revocation rates for CCW permits due to crimes hover around 0.01%-0.02% annually.
Texas: Conviction rates for CCW permit holders are about 12 times lower than those of the general population.
Crime Rates of Non-Permit Holders
Higher Involvement in Crime:
The majority of violent crimes, including firearm-related homicides, are committed by individuals who are not licensed to carry.
Studies have shown that individuals without permits are more likely to obtain firearms illegally and commit crimes at much higher rates.
In my opinion, we should take the following actions:
Remove gun-free zone signage: These signs effectively create open arenas for criminals, signaling where firearms are likely to be present and leaving law-abiding citizens defenseless.
Reduce restrictions for CCW permit holders: Individuals who have been vetted and issued a concealed carry license should face minimal restrictions on where they can carry their firearms. By allowing them to keep their firearms on their person rather than storing them in vehicles or vessels, we could drastically reduce the number of firearms stolen from these locations.
Criminals, by definition, do not abide by our state laws. Restrictive policies do not stop them but instead hinder law-abiding citizens’ constitutional right to bear arms and their ability to protect themselves.
Let’s stand together to protect our freedoms!
Florida Governor’s Office Contact Information:
Phone: (850) 488-7146 to find your Florida representative
Contact Me: About anything, comments on articles, questions you may have, etc.
Texas-Specific Data: Texas is unique in tracking criminal arrests and convictions by immigration status. Research focusing on Texas found that undocumented immigrants had lower conviction rates for crimes, including violent offenses, than native-born Americans. cato.org
Somebody forgot how to add and subtract
“When comparing immigrants (both legal and illegal) to native-born Americans, the data is as follows:
When comparing crime rates, it is essential to combine legal and undocumented immigrants to ensure an accurate comparison with native-born Americans. The aggregated data reveals a difference of 131 per 100,000 residents, indicating that immigrants (legal and undocumented combined) have a higher overall rate of crimes and violent offenses compared to native-born Americans.
Illegal immigrants exhibit higher rates compared to legal immigrants.
This is an example of how the Left attempts to manipulate the data.
Let’s stand up for those who stood up for us.
Call 202-224-3121 to find your Congressional representative.
Contact Me: About anything, comments on articles, questions you may have, etc.
As we enter 2025, it is absolutely vital for Second Amendment supporters to maintain our momentum.
We must:
Block any Congressional gun control “deals,”
Go on the offense with bold pro-gun rights legislation, and
Keep fighting in the courts to eliminate all so-called “Assault Weapons” bans once and for all.
We must remain vigilant and actively engage with both the Senate and the House of Representatives to ensure our voices are heard loud and clear. It’s our responsibility as American citizens to communicate exactly what we expect from our elected officials—to urge them to support and prioritize the policies and actions that align with the will of the people.
This requires each and every one of us to take initiative. We need to articulate our concerns, goals, and expectations directly to our representatives. Whether it’s through phone calls, emails, letters, or town hall meetings, consistent and unified communication is the key to holding them accountable and driving the action we want to see.
Our collective efforts can make a significant impact, but only if we work together and make our voices impossible to ignore. It’s not just about advocacy—it’s about shaping the future we want for our country.
Check out the latest list of 119th Congress bills impacting the Second Amendment community by visiting this link: https://gunrights.org/bill-watch/(FREE)
EXAMPLE EMAIL
Dear {Representative},
These bills pose significant challenges and opportunities for the Second Amendment community. I urge you to oppose any measures that threaten our rights and to support legislation that upholds and strengthens our constitutional freedoms.
Visit the website to view the list of bills and our recommended actions for each one.
I just saw on the Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News YouTube channel (Link to Podcast) that Rep. Thomas Massie [R-KY-4] has introduced H.R.645.
This bill is a game-changer—it aims to eliminate most federal and state firearm regulations, allowing every law-abiding citizen the freedom to carry firearms across all states.
I encourage you to read the bill yourself and reach out to your representatives to voice your support. H.R.645 has the potential to fully restore our Second and Fourteenth Amendment rights, honoring the original intent of our Constitution’s Founding Fathers.
The NAGR has been a leading force in opposing radical anti-gun agendas nationwide. Their uncompromising stance on gun rights drives their mission to hold politicians accountable and protect the Second Amendment. Their efforts have made significant strides in preserving our freedoms, but their success relies heavily on the support of dedicated gun rights advocates like you.
One of the valuable tools they offer is a Bill Watch List, which allows you to track gun-related legislation in Congress. The list includes the bill number (with links), sponsors, subject, location, introduction date, and NAGR’s position on each bill.
For someone like me who has been trying to keep up with these bills, this tool has been a game changer. It helps me understand which bills I want my representatives to support and which ones I oppose.
The best part? You don’t have to be a member of NAGR to access their Bill Watch List.
It’s vital, that we encourage our legislators to actively support and advocate for these important pieces of legislation. Take a moment to contact your representative and let them know exactly how you want them to vote on these bills. Your voice can make a difference!
The 2025 Wyoming House Bill HB0172 is currently progressing toward approval, and if it passes, it has the potential to spark a ripple effect across the nation.
While there are certain aspects of the bill that I believe could be improved or adjusted, its overall objective is a step in the right direction. The bill aims to reduce restrictions on law-abiding Americans with concealed carry permits, ensuring they are not unfairly limited by the numerous locations currently designated as gun-free zones.
I strongly encourage everyone to reach out to their state government representatives and advocate for similar legislation in our own states. By doing so, we can work toward creating policies that respect the rights of responsible gun owners while promoting public safety.
I would like you to review the 2025 Wyoming House Bill HB0172, which seeks to eliminate gun-free zones, and evaluate whether we could implement something similar here in Florida. It’s worth exploring how such legislation might enhance safety and whether it aligns with the needs and values of our state.
The concept of a “Gun-Free Zone” is intended to create safe spaces where firearms are prohibited, but in practice, it can often have unintended consequences. Many argue that posting such zones can inadvertently signal vulnerability to individuals intent on causing harm. Instead of deterring violent actions, these signs may be perceived as an invitation, suggesting a lack of immediate resistance.
For example, designating schools as gun-free zones has not prevented tragic mass shootings from occurring. These areas are often targeted because the likelihood of encountering armed opposition is significantly reduced. This has raised critical questions about whether such policies genuinely enhance safety or if they create environments that unintentionally attract those with malicious intent.
To address this issue, many advocate for alternative solutions, such as implementing stronger security measures, allowing trained personnel to carry firearms, and investing in mental health resources to address the root causes of violence. The debate is complex, but one thing is clear: simply declaring an area a gun-free zone is not enough to ensure the safety of those within it. A multifaceted approach is needed to protect vulnerable spaces effectively and to prevent future tragedies.
Thank you for your consideration,
Dr. Cecil Wayne Thorn
My Thought
The only way to fully restore our firearm rights is to ensure that our state government representatives understand where we stand. We must demand the removal of unnecessary restrictions and advocate for the complete restoration of our Second Amendment rights. It’s time to take a firm stand and remind our leaders that these rights are fundamental to our freedom and security.
