Prioritize the needs of our citizens above all else

This is a comparison of the assistance the U.S. government provides to foreign countries and illegal immigrants versus the support available for U.S. citizens.


US Government Assistance to Foreign Countries (So far for this year 2024)

$24,400,000,000 to Ukraine.
$11,300,000,000 to Israel.
$1,950,000,000 to Ethiopia.
$1,600,000,000 to Jordan.
$1,400,000,000 to Egypt.
$1,100,000,000 to Afghanistan.
$1,100,000,000 to Somalia.
$1,000,000,000 to Yemen.
$987,000,000 to Congo.
$896,000,000 to Syria.

Total: $45,733,000,000

(For financial support, military aid, food assistance, and health programs)


US Government Assistance for Illegal Immigrant

$129,600,000,000,000,000 to illegal immigrant ($9,000 per illegal immigrant that has entered the U.S. from January- June 2024 current estimates 1.44 million according to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

(For Food Assistance, Clothing Assistance, Counseling Services, Health Insurance, Employment Support, Housing Assistance, Public Education, Adult Education, Immigration Legal Services, Phone and service)


US Government most recent Assistance for American Citizens

$3,750,000,000 to approximately 5 million people (Americans who have lost everything to Hurricane Helene will be getting $750, courtesy of FEMA)

$11,000,000,000 for approximately 33,000 Homeless Veterans (For housing, health care, and supportive services)

$3,700,000,000 for approximately 580,000 General Homeless (For shelter, medical care, or long-term housing solutions)

Total: $17,600,000,000


My Thoughts

Our country is currently facing significant challenges, including rising costs for food, gas, electricity, and housing. It’s essential that we prioritize the needs of our nation and its citizens above all else, ensuring they have the resources necessary to lead fulfilling lives and support their families. It seems we have lost our way in this regard.


SUBSCRIBE

Loading

Presidential Candidates: Key priorities and plans they intends to pursue.

2024 Trump Harris

Understanding how the policies and plans of each candidate could affect us is crucial because these decisions have real-world consequences that shape our daily lives and future. A candidate’s policies can impact the economy, healthcare, education, and social justice, directly influencing our financial stability, access to services, and quality of life. By analyzing their plans, we can make informed decisions that align with our values and needs, ensuring that the leadership we choose works in our best interests and those of our communities. This awareness empowers us to participate more actively in the democratic process and advocate for policies that promote a better future for everyone.


Donald Trump

If Donald Trump is reelected in 2024, he has outlined several key priorities and plans that he intends to pursue. These plans reflect his ongoing political themes and goals from his previous presidency, as well as new initiatives. Here are some of the major points:

2024 Republican Party Platform HERE

  • Tax Cuts: Trump has promised to further cut taxes, particularly for middle-income families, and potentially make the 2017 tax cuts permanent.
  • Deregulation: He plans to continue rolling back regulations on businesses, particularly in energy, finance, and healthcare, to stimulate economic growth.
  • Trade Policies: Trump is likely to return to his “America First” trade policies, which could include renegotiating trade deals and imposing tariffs to protect American industries.

2. Immigration:

  • Border Security: Trump plans to resume and expand the construction of the border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. He also intends to implement stricter immigration policies, including reintroducing policies like “Remain in Mexico” and possibly reinstating travel bans on certain countries.
  • Immigration Reform: His plans include further limiting legal immigration and continuing efforts to end birthright citizenship.

3. Foreign Policy:

  • America First Approach: Trump is expected to continue his “America First” foreign policy, focusing on reducing U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts and prioritizing national interests.
  • China and Russia: He has emphasized a tough stance on China, focusing on trade, technology, and security issues. His approach to Russia could involve reducing tensions and seeking cooperation on certain global issues, though this has been controversial.
  • Middle East: Trump may continue to pursue peace agreements between Israel and Arab nations, similar to the Abraham Accords.

4. Energy Policies:

  • Energy Independence: Trump aims to increase domestic energy production, particularly in fossil fuels, to achieve U.S. energy independence. He has criticized Biden’s green energy policies and plans to reverse many of them.
  • Climate Policy: Trump is likely to withdraw from or weaken international climate agreements and reduce environmental regulations that he believes harm the U.S. economy.

5. Healthcare:

  • Repealing Obamacare: Trump has consistently advocated for repealing the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and replacing it with a system that promotes competition and reduces costs, though specific details have been less clear.
  • Drug Prices: He has also emphasized lowering prescription drug prices, continuing efforts from his first term.

6. Law and Order:

  • Crime and Policing: Trump has pledged to be tough on crime, advocating for strong law enforcement and opposing efforts to defund the police. He may push for stricter penalties on violent crime and drug trafficking.
  • Judicial Appointments: Continuing to appoint conservative judges to federal courts, including the Supreme Court, will likely be a priority.

7. Education:

  • School Choice: Trump is a strong advocate for school choice, including expanding charter schools and voucher programs that allow parents to choose where their children attend school.

8. Military and Veterans:

  • Defense Spending: Trump has advocated for maintaining or increasing defense spending to ensure military readiness and superiority.
  • Veteran Care: He plans to continue reforms to the Department of Veterans Affairs to improve healthcare and services for veterans.

9. Culture and Social Issues:

  • Cultural Conservatism: Trump is likely to continue emphasizing traditional values, opposing what he describes as “woke” culture, and pushing back against progressive social policies.
  • Free Speech: He may pursue policies to limit the influence of tech companies and protect free speech, particularly on social media platforms.

Trump’s future plans, if he is reelected, align with his previous presidency’s goals, emphasizing economic growth, national security, and conservative social values. His policies are expected to continue being divisive, appealing strongly to his base while facing significant opposition from his critics.


Kamala Harris

If Kamala Harris were to be elected as President, her plans would likely reflect a continuation and expansion of many of the Biden administration’s priorities, along with her own initiatives. Here’s an overview of what might be expected based on her political career, public statements, and current policy priorities:

1. Economic Policies:

  • Economic Equity: Harris has consistently emphasized addressing economic disparities. As president, she would likely prioritize policies aimed at reducing income inequality, supporting middle and lower-income families, and promoting economic opportunities for historically marginalized communities.
  • Support for Small Businesses: Harris might focus on providing more support for small businesses, especially those owned by women and minorities, through grants, loans, and tax incentives.
  • Workforce Development: She is likely to promote education and training programs to prepare workers for jobs in emerging industries, particularly in technology and clean energy.

2. Healthcare:

  • Universal Healthcare: While Harris supported “Medicare for All” during her 2020 presidential campaign, she has since indicated support for expanding the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) as a more incremental approach. Her presidency would likely aim to increase healthcare coverage and reduce costs.
  • Women’s Health: Harris would likely be a strong advocate for protecting and expanding access to reproductive healthcare, including abortion rights, and addressing maternal health disparities, particularly among women of color.

3. Climate Change and Environmental Policy:

  • Aggressive Climate Action: Harris has a strong record on environmental issues and would likely push for ambitious climate policies, including significant investments in renewable energy, infrastructure, and jobs. She would likely support rejoining international climate agreements and taking a leading role in global climate efforts.
  • Environmental Justice: A key focus for Harris would be on environmental justice, ensuring that low-income communities and communities of color are protected from environmental hazards and benefit from the transition to a green economy.

4. Social Justice and Civil Rights:

  • Racial Justice: Harris would likely continue to focus on racial justice, including reforms in policing, criminal justice, and addressing systemic racism across various sectors. She has been a vocal advocate for police reform and might push for stronger federal oversight of police practices.
  • LGBTQ+ Rights: Harris is a strong supporter of LGBTQ+ rights and would likely advocate for policies to protect these rights, including federal legislation to protect against discrimination.

5. Immigration:

  • Comprehensive Immigration Reform: Harris would likely push for comprehensive immigration reform that includes a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, protections for Dreamers, and reforms to the asylum and refugee systems. She has advocated for more humane immigration policies and would likely seek to roll back Trump-era restrictions.
  • Border Security with Compassion: While she would likely support border security measures, Harris is expected to emphasize humane treatment of migrants and improvements to the immigration and asylum processes.

6. Education:

  • Access to Education: Harris is likely to advocate for increased access to education, including making community college free and reducing the burden of student loans. She has also supported increased funding for public schools, particularly in underserved areas.
  • Early Childhood Education: A strong proponent of early childhood education, Harris would likely push for universal pre-kindergarten and increased support for childcare.

7. Foreign Policy:

  • Diplomacy and Alliances: Harris would likely continue the Biden administration’s emphasis on strengthening international alliances and multilateralism. She would likely focus on diplomacy, human rights, and global cooperation to address issues like climate change and global health.
  • Humanitarian Focus: Harris might prioritize humanitarian efforts, including refugee resettlement and global health initiatives, as part of her broader foreign policy agenda.

8. Gun Control:

  • Stricter Gun Laws: Harris is a strong advocate for gun control and would likely push for stricter gun laws, including universal background checks, an assault weapons ban, and measures to prevent gun violence through red flag laws and other preventive strategies.

9. Women’s Rights:

  • Gender Equality: Harris would likely focus on policies aimed at closing the gender pay gap, expanding paid family leave, and supporting women in the workforce, particularly in leadership roles.
  • Combating Violence Against Women: Harris might advocate for stronger protections and resources for survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking.

10. Technology and Innovation:

  • Tech Regulation: Harris might push for greater regulation of big tech companies, particularly around issues of privacy, data protection, and misinformation. She could also focus on expanding broadband access and digital literacy.

Kamala Harris’s presidency would likely reflect a blend of progressive ideals and pragmatic governance, with a focus on equity, justice, and inclusive economic growth. Her policies would likely build on her experience as a senator and vice president, with a strong emphasis on civil rights, climate action, and social justice.


My Thoughts

When choosing the leaders of our nation, it’s crucial to make informed decisions, as their policies will shape our future. The differences between the candidates are substantial. For instance, Trump has clearly outlined his plans for the country, which are readily accessible online. In contrast, Harris has not provided specific details about her agenda, though it’s likely her priorities will align with those mentioned above. However, there’s still uncertainty about how she would govern.

It’s essential to do your own research and reach your own conclusions. Consider which candidate’s vision aligns most closely with your beliefs about how the government should operate.

USMC is looking at removing or changing their core values of Duty, Honor and Country

USMC logo

Removing “Duty, Honor, Country” from the ethos of the United States Marine Corps (USMC) is a decision that merits careful consideration and debate. However, it’s crucial to understand the rationale behind such a decision and evaluate its potential implications before forming a rebuttal.

  1. Contextual Understanding: Before rebutting, it’s important to understand the reasoning behind the removal of “Duty, Honor, Country.” Is it to modernize the ethos to better align with contemporary military operations and values? Is there evidence to suggest that these values are outdated or ineffective in the current geopolitical landscape? Understanding the context will inform the rebuttal.
  2. Core Values Preservation: “Duty, Honor, Country” are deeply ingrained in the traditions and history of the USMC. They encapsulate the core values that have guided Marines through generations. Removing them risks diluting the essence of what it means to be a Marine and could lead to a loss of identity and morale within the ranks.
  3. Moral Compass: Duty, Honor, Country serve as a moral compass for Marines, guiding their actions both on and off the battlefield. These values emphasize selflessness, integrity, and loyalty to the nation and its people. Removing them may create a void in ethical guidance, potentially leading to a decline in discipline and accountability among service members.
  4. Symbolic Importance: “Duty, Honor, Country” are not just words; they symbolize the sacrifices and commitments of Marines past and present. They inspire unity, resilience, and a sense of purpose among service members. Removing them could be perceived as a dismissal of these sacrifices and could erode the sense of pride and camaraderie within the Marine Corps community.
  5. Public Perception: The ethos of the USMC is not only significant internally but also shapes public perception and trust in the institution. “Duty, Honor, Country” resonate with civilians and reinforce confidence in the Marine Corps’ values and professionalism. Removing them may undermine public trust and lead to skepticism about the Marine Corps’ commitment to its foundational principles.

In conclusion, while changes to military ethos are not uncommon and can be necessary to adapt to evolving circumstances, the removal of “Duty, Honor, Country” from the USMC ethos should be approached with caution. Preserving these core values is essential for maintaining the integrity, identity, and effectiveness of the Marine Corps as a fighting force and a symbol of American strength and values.


Email Subscription

Loading

James Lindsay SHATTERS Woke Ideology

woke-divided-society-media-censorship

We all need to watch this – Lindsay provides comprehensive explanations regarding what is happening and how things are unfolding in the United States.

This is a little long but it will be worth it.


Email Subscription

Loading

Constitution 101

We as a nation have forgot what our country was built upon. Here is a chance for a refresher, Hilldale College is now offering a FREE online class called “Constitution 101”.

Check it out below.

Hillsdale College “Constiution 101”


Email Subscription

Loading

NOTE: Comments will not display until by Moderator.


Why doesn’t Egypt, Arabia, Jordan and other surrounding counties not taking in Palestinians to get them out of harms way?

fight for your freedom

Why does Israelis have to take on the responsibility of protecting the Gaza Palestinians?

When the Palestinians overwhelming give 80% approval of Iran and the Hamas and what they are doing.

Maybe that is why these surrounding countries don’t what to open up there borders to the Palestinians people. Because they are terrorist as well.

If the Palestinian people really what to be FREE the they need to take up arms against the Hamas and fight for there freedom.


Email Subscription

Loading

NOTE: Comments will not display until approved by the Moderator.


Statistics on Cop on Black Crime

This is a short segment from an introductory class on race and culture that is taught by Dr. Sam Richards at Penn State University. Today’s video comes from the eleventh class on September 26, 2017

This is what happens when the News media/social media is bias. You do not get a clear view of what is going on and by who. Remember to get your information right, do some investigating your self before you make claims that our incorrect .

Every life matters, I don’t care what ethnicity you are.

I hope this video make you start to thinking.


NOTE: No comment will be shown until it is approved by the moderator


Palestinians are Terrorist

Palestinian protestors

SOME FACTS:

2005  Israel completed its withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and handed over control of the territory to the Palestinians.

Wikipedia


Israel’s 16-year blockade of Gaza

Israel, with the support of Egypt, imposed a land, sea and air blockade of Gaza in 2007 after Hamas took control of the enclave. Because of the blockade, Gaza is still considered occupied by Israel, according to the UN.

Israel says the blockade is necessary for security reasons, keeping Hamas and other militant groups like the Palestinian Islamic Jihad from importing weapons that can be used against Israel. Israeli officials point to Hamas’ original charter that calls for the destruction of Israel.

Axios.com | Gaza-strip-israel-hamas-war-demographics | 10/21/2023


Why don’t Palestinians fight Hamas?

If Palestinians are against Hamas (their terrorist tactics) then why don’t they actually do something about it. Fight Hamas, turn Hamas in, sabotage Hamas, etc. At some point, if a group claiming to represent me, is doing horrible things that puts me in danger, then I will fight that group. At some point you can’t just sit around with a token denouncement of Hamas. Hamas claims to be fighting for the people of Palestine. If their tactics are so over the top that it’s now actually creating harm to the people of Palestine then the people of Palestine need to get their act together and fight Hamas.

As the saying goes, “The government you elect is the government you deserve.” Or in this case, the terrorist group you choose to represent you is the terrorist group you deserve.

Where is the civil war between Palestinians and Hamas? If I look at something like the American Civil war, we fought for what we felt was right. Why hasn’t Palestinians been fighting Hamas? My only conclusion is they actually support Hamas tactics, even if they say otherwise.

Posted by u/DuaHipa Civil Libertarian


“They could have risen up, they could have fought against that evil regime which took over Gaza in a coup d’état.”

By ITV News International Affairs Editor, Rageh Omaar and News Editor Jessica Omari | 10-13-23


The Palestinian poll—the first of its kind since the Oct. 7 attacks—found that 48.2% of respondents characterize Hamas’s role as “very positive,” while 27.8% view Hamas as “somewhat positive.” Almost 80% regard the role of Hamas’s Al-Qassam Brigades “military” wing as positive.

ANI NEWS | Three-in-four-palestinians-support-hamas-massacre-survey | 11/19/2023


Hamas Covenant 1988 The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement

Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it” (The Martyr, Imam Hassan al-Banna, of blessed memory).

Avalon law yale | Hamas charter


My Comments:

The Palestinian people are complicit with the Hamas, they are not the poor innocent victims caught in the middle of the war between Hamas and Israel.

So the World  is saying we need to give the Palestinians humanitarian  relief, why?, if they are supporting the Hamas.

The protest by the Palestinian people around the world are supporting the Hamas with their chant “from the river to the sea / Palestine will be free” means genocide to the Jewish people.

We should not be supporting the Palestinians. They are part of the Hamas terrorist organization and we should be removing them from our United States of America and sending them to Gaza and anyone who supports them. For the safety if our own country.