“Keep Americans Safe Act” – Evidence Shows Magazine Limits Do Not Reduce Crime

Wayne Thorn

I am writing to urge all of us to oppose the Keep Americans Safe Act. While I understand the intent behind this legislation, history and research show that restricting magazine capacity does not reduce crime and only infringes upon the rights of law-abiding citizens.

The Urban Institute’s 2004 report, which examined the impact of the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban (in effect from 1994 to 2004), found no measurable reduction in violent crime as a result of magazine capacity restrictions. The report concluded that “the ban’s effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement.” This study, along with crime data from 1990 to 2001, provides clear evidence that limiting magazine size does not deter criminals but does place unnecessary burdens on responsible gun owners.

Restricting law-abiding citizens’ access to standard-capacity magazines puts them at a disadvantage for self-defense, especially in rural areas where law enforcement response times can be significant. Criminals do not adhere to magazine restrictions, leaving responsible Americans more vulnerable to attack.

What we don’t need is passing ineffective legislation that restricts constitutional rights, what we do need is to focus on enforcing existing laws, addressing mental health issues, and targeting violent offenders. Contact your representative to please vote NO on the Keep Americans Safe Act and stand up for the Second Amendment.


Call 202-224-3121 to find your Congressional representative.


Contact me below about anything, comments on articles, questions you may have, etc. 


Immigrants had lower conviction rates for crimes, including violent offenses, than native-born Americans

 BULLSHIT!

Texas-Specific Data: Texas is unique in tracking criminal arrests and convictions by immigration status. Research focusing on Texas found that undocumented immigrants had lower conviction rates for crimes, including violent offenses, than native-born Americans.
cato.org

Somebody forgot how to add and subtract

“When comparing immigrants (both legal and illegal) to native-born Americans, the data is as follows:

Native-born Americans: 2,980

Immigrants (Illegal+ Legal): 1,671 + 1,440 = 3,111

Conclusion:

When comparing crime rates, it is essential to combine legal and undocumented immigrants to ensure an accurate comparison with native-born Americans. The aggregated data reveals a difference of 131 per 100,000 residents, indicating that immigrants (legal and undocumented combined) have a higher overall rate of crimes and violent offenses compared to native-born Americans.

Illegal immigrants exhibit higher rates compared to legal immigrants.

This is an example of how the Left attempts to manipulate the data.


Let’s stand up for those who stood up for us.

Call 202-224-3121 to find your Congressional representative.


Contact Me: About anything, comments on articles, questions you may have, etc.