Tag: ATF

Posted on

Shall not be infringed

Dr. Wayne Thorn

There is currently a legal case affecting Second Amendment rights, in which the Department of Justice and the ATF are advocating to maintain restrictions on non-residents purchasing handguns in states where they do not reside. Notably, these restrictions would not apply to rifles.

It is imperative that the President and the Department of Justice reconsider their position, withdraw any opposition to this case, and allow a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.

Here is my letter I sent:

Dear President Trump, and DOJ Pam Bondi

I ask that you instruct DOJ, Pami Bondi, to withdraw any opposition to this action and to grant judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs. Based on the case and statements below.

The case you’re referring to is Elite Precision Customs LLC v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), filed on January 20, 2025, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth Division). The case number is 4:25-cv-00044.Firearms Policy Coalition+4NationBuilder+4CourtListener+4Firearms Policy Coalition+1

Case Overview

This lawsuit challenges the federal ban on interstate transfers of handguns from federally licensed firearms dealers (FFLs) to individuals who are not residents of the state where the dealer is located. Plaintiffs argue that this restriction infringes upon the Second Amendment rights of individuals and businesses.GIFFORDS+3NationBuilder+3Firearms Policy Coalition+3

Second Amendment to the United States Constitution (ratified 1791):

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

“Infringe” was stronger than merely regulate; it implied violation, encroachment, or impairment of a right. It was not used lightly; “infringe” suggested denying or materially restricting a right rather than simply placing conditions on it.

Implication for the Second Amendment

The Framers’ use of “shall not be infringed” suggests that the right to keep and bear arms was meant to be absolute in its protection against government encroachment, though subsequent interpretation has allowed for some regulation that doesn’t destroy the right.

For example, minor regulations constitute infringement; laws that effectively prohibit the right would have been considered infringing in 1791.

Origin / Source

From Latin infringere (“to break, violate”). Common in legal texts and dictionaries of the 18th century.

From Latin incrocare or French encrocher, meaning “to hook into” or “advance beyond proper limits.” Used in legal and property contexts.

Samuel Johnson, 1755

“To violate; to transgress; to break a law or right.”

“To advance beyond proper limits; to intrude.”

Blackstone, 1765–1769

Acts that breach or diminish established rights or liberties.

Acts that intrude upon another’s lawful rights or property, including civil liberties.

Strength / Severity

Stronger: implies violation or material impairment of a right; actionable in law.

Strong but slightly more gradual: implies intrusion or gradual trespass, may or may not constitute full violation, depending on context.

Legal / Rights Implication

Government or individual cannot infringe a right without overstepping legal bounds; protection is absolute.

Encroachment is an unauthorized intrusion; often gradual or creeping; legally objectionable but may describe minor or developing overreach.

Example (18th c. rights context)

“A law prohibiting all citizens from bearing arms infringes the right to keep and bear them.”

“A law requiring burdensome regulations before exercising the right may encroach on the right, depending on severity.”

Thank you,

Stand up for our RIGHTS and make America Great Again

Feel free to ask me about anything, including comments on articles, questions you may have.

Copyright Notice © 2025 Cecil Wayne Thorn Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this work authored by Cecil Wayne Thorn, to distribute, display, and reproduce the work, in its entirety, including verbatim copies, provided that no fee is charged for the copies or distribution. This permission is granted for non-commercial distribution only.

Posted on

DOJ & ATF Go After Pin & Welds & Suppressors…AGAIN

Dr. Wayne Thorn

Here is a letter I sent to Donald Trump and Pam Bondi and each and everyone of us need to do the same to let them know we are not happy.

Dear President Trump,

I hope this message finds you well.

It appears that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) are not fully implementing or adhering to the mandates you have issued regarding the protection of Second Amendment rights. Despite your administration’s clear stance on safeguarding lawful gun ownership, we continue to see concerning actions that suggest overreach and inconsistent application of federal firearms regulations.

Below is a letter I recently sent to Pam Boni regarding this matter. I believe it reflects the growing concern among law-abiding citizens who value their constitutional rights and look to your leadership for continued defense of our freedoms.

I am writing to express serious concern over the recurring emergence of legal cases that appear to challenge established Second Amendment rights—particularly those involving suppressors, “pin and weld” methods, and other firearms-related issues. These cases often seem to originate from what appear to be overly aggressive or ideologically motivated U.S. attorneys, raising questions about oversight and accountability within the Department of Justice.

Why are these cases repeatedly being brought forward despite long-standing legal precedents and administrative guidance? Who is responsible for reviewing and approving such cases before they proceed, and why aren’t questionable filings being dismissed at the outset? The public deserves transparency and assurance that prosecutorial discretion is being exercised fairly and within constitutional bounds.

It has been stated that a specialized office or department exists within the DOJ to evaluate legal matters that may affect Second Amendment rights. If that is the case, its role in reviewing and potentially halting these prosecutions is unclear. From a citizen’s perspective, it appears that this oversight function is either ineffective or not being utilized as intended.

If any U.S. attorneys are acting outside of their proper authority or pursuing cases that lack constitutional merit, we urge immediate disciplinary action, including termination if warranted. Furthermore, a thorough investigation should be conducted to determine how such cases were allowed to proceed.

We the People expect our constitutional rights to be upheld, not undermined by those entrusted with enforcing the law. The DOJ must restore public confidence by ensuring that rogue prosecutions are promptly addressed and prevented from recurring.

Thank you for your continued commitment to the Constitution and to protecting the rights of responsible American gun owners.

Send this to the following people:

President Donald Trump – The Office of Donald J. Trump

Pam Bondi – Pam Bondi Department of Justice

And to all your Congress Representatives and Senators, – https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/current

“We, the American gun owners, must remain steadfast and vocal until President Donald Trump’s Second Amendment directives are fully implemented.”

Feel free to reach out with any questions, feedback on articles, or anything else you’d like to discuss—I’m always happy to connect!

Copyright Notice © 2025 Cecil Wayne Thorn Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this work authored by Cecil Wayne Thorn, to distribute, display, and reproduce the work, in its entirety, including verbatim copies, provided that no fee is charged for the copies or distribution. This permission is granted for non-commercial distribution only.

Posted on

ATF non-complaints with the United States Court Ruling

Wayne Thorn

The ATF is defying a court order by refusing to comply and instead making excuses, gathering additional information on those affected, and imposing unnecessary background checks before returning confiscated items.

These individuals legally purchased these items before the ATF reclassified them as machine guns. Since they were originally classified as non-machine guns at the time of purchase, no additional background checks should be required.

https://gunrightsfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/ATF-Response-to-Non-Compliance-3-11-2025.pdf

Below is a letter I wrote to President Trump regarding this issue. I encourage everyone to do the same.

The ATF has been resisting compliance with federal court orders regarding items it previously classified as machine guns. Now, the agency claims it must re-evaluate whether individuals who legally purchased these items before the classification change have the right to keep them. Additionally, the ATF is demanding documentation proving that these individuals were part of the organization involved in the legal case—essentially com and compiling a list of members, raising concerns about potential misuse of this information to target law-abiding Americans and infringe on their First Amendment rights.

As I have previously shared, the ATF has also been using AI and surveillance cameras to identify individuals on the streets who may be carrying firearms, as well as scanning for people with pending legal issues. These actions raise serious concerns about overreach and privacy violations.

These confiscated items must be returned immediately. Pam Bondi (DOJ) and Acting ATF Director Kash Patel must take action to resolve this issue without delay. These are individuals you appointed, but they have been silent and inactive on this matter. Their inaction is unacceptable.

Given the ATF’s repeated noncompliance with court rulings and its continued excuses for defying judgments, I believe the agency is beyond reform. It must be completely dismantled. I will be closely watching how you address this issue with Bondi and Patel, as I trust you have the power to ensure justice is served.

Here is were you can write to the President: https://www.45office.com/

Contact me below about anything, comments on articles, questions you may have, etc. 

Posted on

ATF using Social Media to spy on 2A citizens

Wayne Thorn

Over the past decade, concerns have escalated regarding the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) and its surveillance practices targeting Second Amendment (2A) advocates. Reports indicate that the ATF has been monitoring social media platforms and employing advanced technologies, such as facial recognition, to identify and track gun owners. This article delves into these practices, the implications for civil liberties, and the ongoing debate surrounding the ATF’s role.

ATF’s Surveillance Practices

In recent years, the ATF has expanded its surveillance capabilities by utilizing facial recognition technology (FRT). According to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the ATF has accessed systems like Clearview AI and Vigilant Solutions, which aggregate billions of facial images from publicly available sources, including social media platforms. Between October 2019 and March 2022, the ATF reportedly conducted at least 549 facial recognition searches on gun owners. While the agency claimed to have halted such practices as of April 2023, subsequent reports suggest otherwise. citeturn0search1

Civil Liberties Concerns

The ATF’s surveillance activities have raised significant civil rights and privacy issues. A 2021 GAO report highlighted that the agency lacked proper oversight regarding its employees’ use of non-federal facial recognition systems. Employees initially used the technology without formal training, raising concerns about accuracy, potential misidentifications, and violations of civil liberties. The GAO emphasized that government surveillance could have a “chilling effect” on individuals exercising their First Amendment rights, and by extension, their Second Amendment rights. citeturn0search1

Congressional Scrutiny

The ATF’s actions have not gone unnoticed by lawmakers. In a 2023 hearing titled “ATF’s Assault on the Second Amendment: When is Enough Enough?”, members of Congress examined the agency’s regulatory overreach and enforcement practices. The hearing addressed concerns about the ATF’s use of surveillance technologies and its impact on law-abiding citizens exercising their constitutional rights. citeturn0search3

Public Outcry and Calls for Reform

The revelation of the ATF’s surveillance practices has led to public outcry, with many advocating for the agency’s abolition. Social media platforms have seen trending calls to dismantle the ATF and repeal certain firearm regulations. For instance, in January 2022, discussions about abolishing the ATF and repealing the National Firearms Act (NFA) gained significant traction online, reflecting widespread dissatisfaction with the agency’s actions.

Conclusion

The ATF’s use of social media surveillance and facial recognition technology to monitor Second Amendment advocates has sparked a national debate about privacy, civil liberties, and government overreach. As technology continues to evolve, it is imperative to balance law enforcement objectives with the protection of individual rights. Ongoing scrutiny and dialogue are essential to ensure that constitutional freedoms are upheld in the face of expanding surveillance capabilities.

Contact President Donald Trump below:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact

Here is my letter to the President

Dear President Trump,

I hope this message finds you well. As a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and an advocate for the constitutional rights of American citizens, I am deeply concerned about the ongoing overreach of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). Reports have surfaced for over a decade indicating that the ATF has been using social media and other digital surveillance methods to monitor and target law-abiding gun owners. This blatant disregard for privacy and constitutional freedoms is unacceptable.

The ATF has repeatedly demonstrated a pattern of overreach, entrapment, and regulatory abuse that directly infringes upon the rights of law-abiding Americans. Rather than serving to protect the people, it has become an agency that imposes arbitrary restrictions and enforces unconstitutional policies that erode our fundamental freedoms.

For these reasons, I urge you to take decisive action to abolish the ATF altogether. Its continued existence serves only to undermine the Second Amendment and burden responsible gun owners with unnecessary and unconstitutional regulations. The American people deserve better than a rogue agency that operates with little accountability and routinely oversteps its authority.

I appreciate your unwavering support for our constitutional rights and trust that you will take a strong stance against government overreach. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to seeing action taken to restore the rights and liberties of American citizens.

Contact me below about anything, comments on articles, questions you may have, etc. 

Posted on

ATF’s new appointment?

Dr. Wayne Thorn

We must urge President Trump and our state representatives to carefully consider the appointment of the new ATF director, ensuring that the agency is led by someone who truly understands firearms, rather than another career bureaucrat or law enforcement officer who lacks firsthand expertise.

For far too long, the ATF has been driven by political agendas and regulatory overreach rather than sound, informed decision-making. Instead of appointing yet another figurehead who may enforce misguided policies, the agency needs a leader who is a true firearms expert—someone deeply knowledgeable about the mechanics, functionality, and legal landscape of firearms in America. The person in charge should not only be fluent in firearm technology and safety but also respect the rights of law-abiding gun owners and the Second Amendment.

The ATF was originally established to oversee taxation and licensing related to firearms, tobacco, and alcohol—not to arbitrarily regulate and restrict the rights of responsible citizens. Over time, however, it has strayed from this mission, increasingly imposing confusing and contradictory regulations that create legal traps for gun owners rather than ensuring public safety. A leader without true firearms expertise will only continue this trend, further eroding trust in the agency and its ability to serve the public fairly.

Recent incidents have only underscored the ATF’s lack of practical knowledge. In a widely circulated interview, an ATF official embarrassingly failed to perform a basic task—disassembling a standard Glock pistol—demonstrating a shocking lack of familiarity with the very items they seek to regulate. If agency officials cannot perform such fundamental operations, how can they be expected to craft fair and effective policies?

(Watch here: https://youtu.be/VJFlgwTRYLE)

Now more than ever, we need a strong, competent leader at the ATF—one who prioritizes facts over fear, expertise over political ideology, and constitutional rights over bureaucratic control. We must speak out, demand accountability, and ensure that the next ATF director is not just another enforcer of flawed policies but a knowledgeable advocate for responsible firearm regulation based on reality, not rhetoric.

Let’s stand together to protect our freedoms!

Call 202-224-3121 to find your Congressional representative.

Here is the link to President Trump’s contact page: https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

Contact Me: About anything, comments on articles, questions you may have, etc.