I was looking for information on gun incident reports in gun-free zones versus non-gun-free zones. Using ChatGPT, it gave me reports that were stated as being non-partisan and non-bias 3 of the 4 were given as accurate reporting. They said on the surface that there appears to be more gun-free zones had fewer gun incidences and then added that this is more Caveat, and it appears there are fewer gun incidents in gun-free zones
Also, this research is coming from states that are Democratic. The 4th research totally disagreed with them and was blasted the 4th report altogether.
So I adventurally go down to the nitty gritty and told ChatGPT to give me reported gun violence and whether these were in gun-free zones or non-gun-free zones, and instead it gave me the reports again. I then told it from news media accounts, then it started giving me at first 26 incidents and most were in gun-free zones. But then stated these were only high-profile incidents, so that was not a good sampling to be able to agree that there is more shooting in gun-free zones.
So I said give me 26 random incidences it did and all of them were in gun-free zones.
I then told it using both hight profile and random incidences and give me the average presentages in a chart
And then it recanted it claims
Here is my ChatGPT screens from beginning to the end (pdf). I also did this on Perplexity AI and ended up with the same results. I then sent a message to Donald Trump about his support for this AI, and it was very left-leaning with its results and told him that This AI was not non-partisan or non- bias.
Final Statement
We need to send a message to the President and Congress to shut down Gun-Free Zones and Make America Safe Again for our families, neighbors, states, and country.
I have a question on law-abiding citizens and self-defense. Here is the question:
“Gun control advocates often claim that civilians don’t need an AR-15 for self-defense—that a handgun should be enough. But if that’s true, why do law enforcement officers carry both a handgun and an AR-15? If a handgun is sufficient for protection, then why aren’t we asking police to give up their rifles too?”
We have another example of how Gun Control and Gun Free Zones do not protect people with the Mall of America shooting. Here is what we know so far:
The Mall of America under Minnesota state law is a gun free zone. The Mall of America posts these signs:
At least 6 gang members were carrying firearms despite the law and involved in shooting and killing a 19-year old. 5 have been arrested so far. 2 are 18 years old and 3 are 17 years old. Minnesota does not issue CCW permits to anybody under 21, so they were carrying illegally. It was illegal for them to carry in the Mall. One of them is believed to be the shooter who killed the 19 year old. It is possible another of them also fired a firearm, but all are suspects involved according to police.
There were 16 police officers on duty in the Mall. Despite that all of the suspects left the Mall without being arrested, and went to White Castle to eat.
Compare that the the Greenwood Mall shooting. Where state law does not give the No Weapons signs legal force, and an attempted mass shooting was stopped by a concealed carry holder.
The Greenwood Park Mall shooting occurred in the state of Indiana. Specifically, at the Greenwood Park Mall in Greenwood, Indiana, a suburb located just south of Indianapolis .(Wikipedia)
During the incident, a gunman opened fire in the mall’s food court, resulting in the deaths of three individuals and injuries to two others. The shooter was subsequently fatally shot by Elisjsha Dicken, a 22-year-old legally armed civilian who was present at the scene .(Axios, Wikipedia)
The swift intervention by Dicken was widely recognized and praised by local and state officials for preventing further casualties .
My Thoughts
“These incidents make one thing clear: gun-free zones and restrictive carry laws may disarm the law-abiding, but they do little to stop those with criminal intent. Real safety comes not from signs and statutes alone, but from empowering responsible citizens to protect themselves and others when seconds count.”
In areas where civilians were legally permitted to carry firearms, the intervention rate by armed citizens was even higher. The CPRC found that in such locations, armed civilians stopped 51.5% of active shooter incidents, compared to 44.6% stopped by police.
John Cornyn Has Sold Out the Second Amendment — It’s Time to Hold Him Accountable
You deserve to know the full truth about Texas U.S. Senator John Cornyn and the damage he’s done to our Second Amendment rights.
As we approach the high-stakes 2026 Republican primary, gun owners and constitutional conservatives have a clear mission: Fire John Cornyn and replace him with a Republican who will fight—not compromise—for our God-given right to keep and bear arms.
Cornyn has repeatedly caved to the radical anti-gun left, helping push so-called “bipartisan” gun control that threatens the freedoms of every law-abiding American. Red flag laws. Expanded background checks. Deals made behind closed doors. That’s not leadership—it’s betrayal.
The attached reprint from the National Association for Gun Rights lays it all out—chapter and verse. Every vote. Every deal. Every attack on your rights.
This year’s 2025 Legislative session, Florida state lawmakers have been busy filing hundreds of different bills.
Among these, several are aimed at changing up state laws involving gun ownership, pushed by Republicans and Democrats alike. These bills involve topics like age limits, storage requirements, and harsh crackdowns on gun sales.
To become law, these bills require the approval of both the state Senate and House, as well as a signature from Gov. Ron DeSantis.
We must all make our voices heard and help shape Florida’s government based on the will of its constituents. One way to do this is by sharing your message, just as I have done below.
Here is my letter about how I want our Governor and my Representative to vote on these issues
To Governor Ron DeSantis and my State Representative Josie Tomkow,
This is how I want you to vote on the following Gun bills.
HB15 – Vote NO
I would want a better option of not restricting CCW/P citizens to be able to carry anywhere. This way the criminals would be stopped getting firearms from vehicles, because of the restriction this is like saying you want a gun. All you have to do is go to a parking lot, there is plenty available in the vehicles.
I sent you a letter earlier that we should do the same thing Wyoming is doing removing gun-free zones. Also, concealed carry permit holders stopped 51.5 percent of active shootings, compared to 44.6 percent stopped by police.
See the report: https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/11/study-concealed-carriers-do-a-better-job-of-stopping-active-shooters-than-police/
HB53 – Vote NO
You will be placing an unnecessary burden on law-abiding citizens by requiring an additional background check and its associated fee for every ammunition purchase.
This legislation is a reaction to a single tragic incident. While the event was terrible, it should not be used as justification to impose broad restrictions that unfairly impact all responsible citizens.
HB491 Vote YES if not NO- with the below changes
I agree with this bill, if it removed the exceptions – I go back to my statement about removing gun-free zones altogether for CCW/P citizens
HB759 Vote YES
Young men as young as 18 have been called to serve in the military, bearing arms to defend our country since before the ratification of the Constitution. Yet, they are deemed incompetent to purchase a firearm for personal defense. If they are truly incapable of responsible firearm ownership, then by the same logic, no one under 21 should be allowed to enlist in the Armed Forces.
HB1019 Vote NO
That would mean that if I wanted to pass down a firearm to a family member in my will, there would be no way to conduct a background check on both parties. Private transfers or sales would no longer be possible, despite the fact that such transactions have historically been allowed without issue.
Gun manufacturers have been providing gun locks with their firearms for years, even without a legal mandate.
Home gun manufacturing has been practiced since before the Constitution was written. There were no licensing requirements for building firearms, nor any mandates for serial numbers to be engraved on them.
Gun enthusiasts have been creating 3D-printed firearms as a way to test their skills and refine their gunsmithing abilities. While many early attempts result in failure, they continue learning and improving their techniques.
H6003 Vote NO
This would grant local governments the authority to establish their own gun-related regulations, covering aspects such as sales, ownership, possession, storage, and taxation.
HB6025 Vote NO
Just look at California it became a looter haven – until law abiding citizen (with Arms) took actions to protect what they had left for themselves and others, there was not enough police to go around to protect them- and the citizens deterred looter.
SB188 Vote NO
If a person has a CCW/P permit, there should be no need to further restrict them, as they have already undergone thorough vetting. Restricting them only creates unnecessary complications, such as forcing them to temporarily leave their firearm in a vehicle, where it becomes vulnerable to theft.
Gun-free zones essentially signal to criminals that no one present can stop them. If certain locations must prohibit firearms, CCW permit holders should be treated similarly to law enforcement—security could temporarily hold their weapon and return it upon departure, ensuring that no firearms are left unattended. However, even this approach risks creating another location with no deterrent for criminals.
SB814 Vote NO
The policy bans individuals from storing firearms—rather than merely possessing them—at school-sponsored events or on school property. This includes storing them in a vehicle, effectively requiring attendees to leave their firearms at home. As a result, law-abiding citizens are left vulnerable to potential threats from the moment they leave their homes until they return.
SB 1338 Vote NO
This policy infringes on our Second Amendment rights to keep and bear arms, restricting firearm possession to our homes or designated storage facilities like shooting ranges.
By this logic, it also limits our ability to transport firearms altogether. Millions of civilian versions AR-15s—often mislabeled as “assault weapons”—are commonly used for competition shooting, recreational target practice, and hunting.
A true “assault weapon” is a firearm capable of firing multiple rounds with a single pull of the trigger—also known as a “machine gun.” In contrast, civilian versions of the AR-15 are semi-automatic, meaning they fire one round per trigger pull.
Thank you for your time,
Dr. Cecil W Thorn
Below is the link to find your state representative and the link to Governor DeSantis
I wanted to bring to your attention Wyoming’s recent move to eliminate gun-free zones statewide—a bold step in restoring Second Amendment rights and ensuring the safety of law-abiding citizens.
Gun-free zones have consistently proven to be ineffective deterrents to crime, often leaving law-abiding citizens vulnerable while criminals ignore these restrictions. Wyoming’s decision to crush gun-free zones recognizes the fundamental right of self-defense and empowers individuals to protect themselves and others.
I strongly believe we should take similar action in Florida and push for legislation that removes these ineffective and dangerous restrictions. Protecting our constitutional rights and ensuring the safety of our communities should be a priority. I urge you to consider advocating for something like this measure and working toward making our entire state a no gun-free zone state.
Now, I do not agree with everything in the bill, but it may help us in Florida to make us a no-gun-free zone state as well.
“Your voice matters! Reach out to your representatives and stand for a safer future—let them know where you stand on the idea of a no-gun-free zone state.”
Over the past decade, concerns have escalated regarding the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) and its surveillance practices targeting Second Amendment (2A) advocates. Reports indicate that the ATF has been monitoring social media platforms and employing advanced technologies, such as facial recognition, to identify and track gun owners. This article delves into these practices, the implications for civil liberties, and the ongoing debate surrounding the ATF’s role.
ATF’s Surveillance Practices
In recent years, the ATF has expanded its surveillance capabilities by utilizing facial recognition technology (FRT). According to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the ATF has accessed systems like Clearview AI and Vigilant Solutions, which aggregate billions of facial images from publicly available sources, including social media platforms. Between October 2019 and March 2022, the ATF reportedly conducted at least 549 facial recognition searches on gun owners. While the agency claimed to have halted such practices as of April 2023, subsequent reports suggest otherwise. citeturn0search1
Civil Liberties Concerns
The ATF’s surveillance activities have raised significant civil rights and privacy issues. A 2021 GAO report highlighted that the agency lacked proper oversight regarding its employees’ use of non-federal facial recognition systems. Employees initially used the technology without formal training, raising concerns about accuracy, potential misidentifications, and violations of civil liberties. The GAO emphasized that government surveillance could have a “chilling effect” on individuals exercising their First Amendment rights, and by extension, their Second Amendment rights. citeturn0search1
Congressional Scrutiny
The ATF’s actions have not gone unnoticed by lawmakers. In a 2023 hearing titled “ATF’s Assault on the Second Amendment: When is Enough Enough?”, members of Congress examined the agency’s regulatory overreach and enforcement practices. The hearing addressed concerns about the ATF’s use of surveillance technologies and its impact on law-abiding citizens exercising their constitutional rights. citeturn0search3
Public Outcry and Calls for Reform
The revelation of the ATF’s surveillance practices has led to public outcry, with many advocating for the agency’s abolition. Social media platforms have seen trending calls to dismantle the ATF and repeal certain firearm regulations. For instance, in January 2022, discussions about abolishing the ATF and repealing the National Firearms Act (NFA) gained significant traction online, reflecting widespread dissatisfaction with the agency’s actions.
Conclusion
The ATF’s use of social media surveillance and facial recognition technology to monitor Second Amendment advocates has sparked a national debate about privacy, civil liberties, and government overreach. As technology continues to evolve, it is imperative to balance law enforcement objectives with the protection of individual rights. Ongoing scrutiny and dialogue are essential to ensure that constitutional freedoms are upheld in the face of expanding surveillance capabilities.
I hope this message finds you well. As a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and an advocate for the constitutional rights of American citizens, I am deeply concerned about the ongoing overreach of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). Reports have surfaced for over a decade indicating that the ATF has been using social media and other digital surveillance methods to monitor and target law-abiding gun owners. This blatant disregard for privacy and constitutional freedoms is unacceptable.
The ATF has repeatedly demonstrated a pattern of overreach, entrapment, and regulatory abuse that directly infringes upon the rights of law-abiding Americans. Rather than serving to protect the people, it has become an agency that imposes arbitrary restrictions and enforces unconstitutional policies that erode our fundamental freedoms.
For these reasons, I urge you to take decisive action to abolish the ATF altogether. Its continued existence serves only to undermine the Second Amendment and burden responsible gun owners with unnecessary and unconstitutional regulations. The American people deserve better than a rogue agency that operates with little accountability and routinely oversteps its authority.
I appreciate your unwavering support for our constitutional rights and trust that you will take a strong stance against government overreach. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to seeing action taken to restore the rights and liberties of American citizens.
Contact me below about anything, comments on articles, questions you may have, etc.
The Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act (H.R. 1041) is a crucial piece of legislation that protects the constitutional rights of those who have served our country. If you are a veteran or a supporter of the Second Amendment, now is the time to take action and contact your representative to demand support for this bill.
What is H.R. 1041?
Currently, thousands of veterans are unjustly stripped of their gun rights simply because they have a fiduciary trustee managing their VA benefits. Under current law, if the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) appoints someone to help a veteran manage their finances, that veteran can be reported to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) as mentally incompetent—without due process. This means that veterans, who have honorably served our country, can lose their Second Amendment rights without ever being deemed a danger to themselves or others by a judge.
The Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act (H.R. 1041) seeks to correct this injustice by ensuring that no veteran is automatically placed in NICS unless a judge determines they pose a danger to themselves or others. This bill restores fairness and prevents bureaucratic overreach from unjustly infringing on veterans’ rights.
Why This Matters
Protects Due Process: Veterans should not lose their constitutional rights without a fair legal process.
Prevents Bureaucratic Overreach: The VA should not have the power to decide who can or cannot own a firearm without a judicial ruling.
Respects Those Who Served: Veterans fought to defend our freedoms; they should not have to fight their own government to keep their rights.
How You Can Help
H.R. 1041 needs strong support from both veterans and Second Amendment advocates. Here’s what you can do:
Contact Your Representative – Call, email, or write to your congressional representative and urge them to support H.R. 1041.
Spread the Word – Share this information with fellow veterans, gun rights supporters, and your community.
Join Advocacy Groups – Organizations like the NRA, GOA, and VFW are fighting for veterans’ rights—consider joining them in their efforts.
Time to Act
The rights of our veterans are on the line. No veteran should be denied their Second Amendment freedoms without due process. H.R. 1041 is a common-sense bill that ensures fairness and protects the very people who fought for our freedoms.
📢 Contact your representative today and demand they support H.R. 1041!
Let’s stand up for those who stood up for us.
Call 202-224-3121 to find your Congressional representative.
Contact Me: About anything, comments on articles, questions you may have, etc.
The UN Small Arms Treaty 2024 is back in the spotlight, and this time, our U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield to the UN helped draft it. This is a direct threat to American gun owners and the Second Amendment, and you need to act now!
What’s Happening?
For years, the United Nations has been pushing for global gun control through international treaties aimed at restricting civilian firearm ownership. The latest version of the UN Small Arms Treaty, set for discussion in 2024, has direct U.S. involvement in its drafting—a dangerous shift that could put American gun rights at risk.
Even more concerning, USAID has been funneling money to anti-gun groups, effectively using taxpayer dollars to undermine the rights of American citizens. These funds are helping foreign and domestic organizations push anti-gun legislation that could lead to registration, restrictions, and even confiscation.
New evidence obtained by your National Association for Gun Rights suggests that American taxpayer dollars have been quietly funneled from USAID, the Tides Foundation, and other public funding sources…
…to “Control Arms” via their associated organization “Nonviolence International” – both of whom have LONG been the world’s loudest cheerleaders for the UN “Small Arms Treaty.”
It is my hope that we can BLOW the lid off of this funding scheme and get to the bottom of it now, and convince Congress, President Trump, and the DOGE team to act.
Why This is Dangerous
International Oversight: The treaty pushes for more global oversight of civilian firearms, opening the door for international influence over U.S. gun laws.
Backdoor Gun Control: While it claims to target arms trafficking, past treaties have included provisions that limit private firearm ownership.
Taxpayer-Funded Anti-Gun Agendas: Your own money is being sent to groups actively working to strip away your rights.
How You Can Fight Back
Contact Your Representatives – Demand they oppose any attempt to sign onto the UN Small Arms Treaty.
Expose USAID’s Anti-Gun Funding – Call for transparency and accountability in where our tax dollars are going.
Spread the Word – The media won’t cover this, so share this with fellow gun owners, veterans, and Second Amendment advocates.
Time is Running Out
The Biden administration could have used this treaty to bypass Congress, implementing new gun control measures without legislative approval. If we don’t stop this now, we could see an international framework used to restrict American gun ownership.
🚨 Call your representatives today and demand they reject the UN Small Arms Treaty! This time, our U.S. representative to the UN helped draft it. This is a direct threat to American gun owners and the Second Amendment, and you need to act now!🚨
Let’s stand up for those who stood up for us.
Call 202-224-3121 to find your Congressional Representative.
Contact Me Below: About anything, comments on articles, questions you, may have, etc.
An act relating to storage of firearms in motor 3 vehicles or vessels; creating s. 790.176, F.S.; 4 providing definitions; providing requirements for 5 storage of firearms and ammunition in motor vehicles 6 or vessels; providing criminal penalties; providing an effective date.
Where might these individuals be seeking firearms? My initial guess would be areas displaying signs such as:
Signs for “Gun-Free Zones” often include variations of the following wording:
“Gun-Free Zone”
“No Firearms Allowed”
“Weapons Are Prohibited on These Premises”
“No Guns Allowed Beyond This Point”
“The Possession of Firearms or Weapons Is Prohibited”
“Pursuant to [State Code/Ordinance], Firearms Are Not Allowed Here”
These signs may also include:
A red circle with a diagonal slash over a gun icon.
Specific legal references (e.g., a state law or local ordinance).
Language clarifying exceptions (e.g., “Law Enforcement Personnel Exempt”).
When these signs are displayed, they signal to criminals that they face no immediate danger at this location. Additionally, they create an environment where many firearms must be stored in vehicles, providing criminals with an easy opportunity to steal weapons and act without resistance.
How many firearms are in Florida?
Registered Firearms: As of 2021, Florida had 518,725 registered firearms, ranking second in the nation behind Texas. statista.com
Household Gun Ownership: Approximately 35.3% of adults in Florida reside in homes with guns.
How many CCW licenses are there in Florida?
As of December 31, 2024, Florida has issued approximately 2.64 million concealed weapon or firearm licenses. [fdacs.gov]
This figure includes both resident and non-resident permits. Notably, Florida was the first state to surpass 2 million concealed carry permits. (usconcealedcarry.com)
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of women obtaining concealed weapons licenses in Florida. As of February 28, 2023, one-third of the license holders are women. (wusf.org)
It’s important to note that Florida enacted a permitless carry law in 2023, allowing legal residents to carry concealed firearms without a permit. Despite this, many residents continue to obtain permits, often to carry in other states with reciprocity agreements. (foxnews.com)
Comparing Crime Rates: CCW Permit Holders vs. Non-Permit Holders
Crime Rates of CCW Permit Holders
Lower Crime Rates:
Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC):
CCW permit holders are among the most law-abiding citizens in the U.S.
In 2016, CCW permit holders were reportedly responsible for about 0.007% of all murders nationwide.
In states like Florida and Texas, permit holders are found to commit crimes (including violent crimes) at significantly lower rates than the general population. For example:
Florida: Revocation rates for CCW permits due to crimes hover around 0.01%-0.02% annually.
Texas: Conviction rates for CCW permit holders are about 12 times lower than those of the general population.
Crime Rates of Non-Permit Holders
Higher Involvement in Crime:
The majority of violent crimes, including firearm-related homicides, are committed by individuals who are not licensed to carry.
Studies have shown that individuals without permits are more likely to obtain firearms illegally and commit crimes at much higher rates.
In my opinion, we should take the following actions:
Remove gun-free zone signage: These signs effectively create open arenas for criminals, signaling where firearms are likely to be present and leaving law-abiding citizens defenseless.
Reduce restrictions for CCW permit holders: Individuals who have been vetted and issued a concealed carry license should face minimal restrictions on where they can carry their firearms. By allowing them to keep their firearms on their person rather than storing them in vehicles or vessels, we could drastically reduce the number of firearms stolen from these locations.
Criminals, by definition, do not abide by our state laws. Restrictive policies do not stop them but instead hinder law-abiding citizens’ constitutional right to bear arms and their ability to protect themselves.
Let’s stand together to protect our freedoms!
Florida Governor’s Office Contact Information:
Phone: (850) 488-7146 to find your Florida representative
Contact Me: About anything, comments on articles, questions you may have, etc.
