I have a question on law-abiding citizens and self-defense. Here is the question:
“Gun control advocates often claim that civilians don’t need an AR-15 for self-defense—that a handgun should be enough. But if that’s true, why do law enforcement officers carry both a handgun and an AR-15? If a handgun is sufficient for protection, then why aren’t we asking police to give up their rifles too?”
Give me your comments.
GIVE ME YOUR COMMENTS:
I will post them after review
Copyright Notice © 2025 Cecil Wayne Thorn Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this work authored by Cecil Wayne Thorn, to distribute, display, and reproduce the work, in its entirety, including verbatim copies, provided that no fee is charged for the copies or distribution. This permission is granted for non-commercial distribution only.